Energievisie Nieuw Den Helder Centrum : kansen voor energiebesparing en duurzame energie bij de herstructurering:
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Between 2002 and 2005 housing association Woningstichting Den Helder carries out an extensive restructuring in the quarter Nieuw Den Helder Centrum in cooperation with the municipality of Den Helder.This restructuring encompasses the construction of around 240 houses and the restructuring and renovation of around 1000 apartments and low-rise buildings.The purpose of this energy vision is to examine which measures the housing association can take in this restructuring to limit the environmental effects of the energy consumption in the houses and to decrease the dependence from external energy suppliers.An inventory of the energy consumption in the quarter shows that in the reference situation the energy consumption in the district is 1.750.000m 3 natural gas en 2.500.000kWh electricity.The accompanying CO 2 emission is 4500 ton/year.A reduction in CO 2 emission of 50% is feasable through a combination of measures in the new houses, in the existing houses and on the level of the quarter.With these measures the share of renewable energy can be brought to almost 40%.Most of the measures also have other advantages, like better comfort and better appearance of the houses.The housing association can also strengthen its position in the negotiations with the energy companies if it keeps open the possibility to cooperate with various energy companies.Solely measure-dependent subsidies have been taken into account in the determination of the financial feasability of the measures.Supplementary project subsidies can make implementation of the measures more attractive.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it