The Effect of Rhytmic Movement Therapy with Music on Independence in Daily Living Activities and Activity Performance among Inividual with Parkinsonism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of rhythmic movement therapy with music on independence level of daily living and activity performance in two cases who was idiopathic parkinsonism. Materials and Method: The sociodemographic questionnaire which formed by researcher, Functional Independence Measurement (FIM) for determination of independency in activities of daily living (ADL) and Canadian Occupational Performance Measurement (COPM) for determination of activity performance were applied in both cases. The music preferences of the cases were identified as instrumental nostalgic music with music interest checklist which prepared by researcher. The speed of music was increased gradually with Audocity program. The intervention program was created with analyzing the movement that necessary ones in ADL. The intervention was applied 6 weeks, 1 session each week and 45 minute each session as a group activity. Results: It wasn’t observed distinctive change at the independency level of ADL of 70 year old Case 1 and 66 year old Case 2 but statistical significant changes were found in activity performance and satisfaction scores of COPM. conclusion: It is concluded that rhythmic movement therapy with music is effective on increasing the performance and satisfaction in ADL of people with parkinsonism. The productivity of rehabilitation process can increase with using the rhythmic movement therapy with music. It is thought that if the length of the intervention duration increases, positive significant changes may occur on ADL
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".