Effect of folylpolyglutamate synthetase modulation on chemosensitivity of colon cancer cells to 5-fluorouracil and methotrexate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Folylpoly-c-glutamate synthetase (FPGS) converts intracellular folates and antifolates (for example, methotrexate (MTX)) to polyglutamates.Polyglutamylated folates and antifolates are retained in cells longer and are better substrates than their monoglutamate counterparts for enzymes involved in one carbon transfer.Polyglutamylation of intracellular 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate may also enhance the cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by allowing more efficient formation and stabilisation of the inhibitory ternary complex involving thymidylate synthase and a 5-FU metabolite.Aim: We investigated the effects of FPGS modulation on the chemosensitivity of colon cancer cells to 5-FU and MTX.Methods: Human HCT116 colon cancer cells were stably transfected with the sense or antisense FPGS cDNA or blank (control).FPGS protein expression and enzyme activity, growth rate, intracellular folate content and composition, and in vitro chemosensitivity to 5-FU and MTX were determined.Results: Compared with cells expressing endogenous FPGS, those overexpressing FPGS had significantly faster growth rates and higher concentrations of total folate and long chain folate polyglutamates while antisense FPGS inhibition produced opposite results.FPGS overexpression significantly enhanced, whereas FPGS inhibition decreased, chemosensitivity to 5-FU.No significant difference in chemosensitivity to MTX was observed.Conclusions: These data provide functional evidence that FPGS overexpression and inhibition modulate chemosensitivity of colon cancer cells to 5-FU by altering intracellular folate polyglutamylation, providing proof of principle.Thus FPGS status may be an important predictor of chemosensitivity of colon cancer cells to 5-FU based chemotherapy, and FPGS gene transfer may increase the sensitivity of colon cancer cells to 5-FU-based chemotherapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".