MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7000230452

Effects of omitting one udder quarter at one single milking : on milk production and SCC in mid and late lactating cows with or without re-sorting for a second milking

2016· other· en· W7000230452 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEpsilon Archive for Student Projects (University of Southampton) · 2016
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUdderMilkingSomatic cell countQuarter (Canadian coin)Milk productionAutomatic milkingBreedLactationDairy cattle
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this study was to investigate if one single omitted milking on one udder quarter with or without re-sorting affects milk yield and udder health in cows in mid or late lactation. The study was carried out in an automatic milking rotary (AMR). It is an identified problem in automatic milking that one or more udder quarters are incompletely milked due to failed teat cup attachment or cows kicking teatcups off. At present, cows that are registered as incompletely milked on one udder quarter or more in the AMR used in this study are resorted for a second milking since it has been shown that extended milking intervals in early- and mid-lactation can lead to a decrease in milk yield and also cause an elevated somatic cell count (SCC) which is an indicator of impaired udder health. Resorting reduces the capacity of the AMR and for the individual cow resorting leads to more time away from feed and cubicles which can impair cow welfare or milk production or both. 36 cows of Swedish Holstein and Swedish Red Breed in day 167 to 376 in lactation were used in the experiment and were divided into two groups, control and treatment. All cows were subjected to one udder quarter being omitted at one milking. After the omitted milking, control cows were resorted back for a second milking while treatment cows were directed to exit. Composite milk and udder quarter milk sampling was performed for three days before and ten days after the treatment day and used for determination of SCC, lactose, milk fat and milk protein. In addition, milk yield was registered throughout the experiment period. Milk yield was 3.7kg lower on the treatment day but no negative long-term effect on milk yield or SCC was found. Furthermore, milk yield from the omitted teat was low on resorting, indicating that a resorting likely does not lead to a complete emptying of the omitted quarter. Therefore, it was concluded that a cow in mid or late lactation has no beneficial effects of being resorted for a second milking in an AMR. A cow can instead the allowed to return to feeding and cubicles after a single incomplete milking, allowing a higher capacity of the AMR. Effects of incomplete milking in early and peak lactation and repeated incomplete milking in any stage of lactation remain to be studied.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEpsilon Archive for Student Projects (University of Southampton)French-language works237,207