El entorno en prisión como factor central del proceso de resocialización
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bajo el supuesto de que, a través del acondicionamiento físico de los lugares en prisión es posible brindar a los reclusos herramientas que garanticen sus Derechos Humanos y beneficien su proceso de resocialización. Se exponen cuatro capítulos, por medio de revisión bibliográfica y once entrevistas semiestructuradas a pospenados y expertos del medio penitenciario colombiano, evidenciando que Colombia, necesita adaptar su entorno penitenciario para cumplir con el fin resocializador. Se propone que todo espacio penitenciario brinde condiciones básicas de vida digna, y que, los lugares esenciales en el proceso de resocialización como los espacios de alojamiento, educación, trabajo, ocio y visitas, utilicen el entorno como instrumento en sí mismo para facilitar el proceso de retorno a la libertad.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".