MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7000311529

ENERGY PRODUCTION FROM SEA WAVES AND CURRENTS. A GENERAL REVIEW

2015· other· en· W7000311529 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Thessaly Institutional Repository (University of Thessaly) · 2015
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNucleofectionHyporeflexiaGestational periodArticular cartilage damageTSG101Liquation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Energy from the sea constitutes the 'blue' type of the renewable energy sources (RES). During the last decades, a number of devices for electric energy production from sea waves and currents are in implementation. Depending on their location and the technologies, different types of those devices were developed. Concerning the highest mean wave power worldwide, this varies from 20 to 70 kW/m at the coasts of West Europe, Canada, USA, south coasts of Australia and Latin America. In the Mediterranean Sea the wave power varies between 4 and 11 kW/m. Regarding the the currents energy, the main exploitable type is the tidal currents mainly at West Europe and North America East coasts. Many countries of the afore-mentioned areas have exploited the energy from sea before the end of the previous millennium. Other countries, with low sea energy potential, are at the level of theoretical investigation. A special case of profitable exploitation of the 'marine' energy, especially when this energy potential is low, is the construction and operation of structures or devices which, apart from their main role (the protection of a harbour or desalination of the seawater), have also the additional role of the sea energy exploitation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Thessaly Institutional Repository (University of Thessaly)French-language works237,207