Fast Nonlinear Model Predictive Control of Quadrotors: Design and Experiments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quadrotor (or quadcopter) is a type of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). Due to the quadrotors simple and inexpensive design, they have become popular platforms. This thesis proposes a computationally fast scheme for implementing Nonlinear Model Predictive Control (NMPC) as a high-level controller to solve the path following problem for unmanned quadrotors. After discussing the background and reviewing the literature, it is noted that this problem referred widely in the literature as a necessary step toward the autonomous flight of quadrotor UAVs. The previous studies usually used simplified models which are computationally uncomplicated and straightforward in terms of control developments and stability investigations. Moreover, some articles are presented showing the importance of accurate state observation on the performance of feedback-based control approaches. \nThe NMPC-based controller is designed using a more realistic highly nonlinear control-oriented model which requires heavy computations for practical real-time implementations. To deal with this issue, the Newton generalized minimal residual (Newton/GMRES) method is applied to solve the NMPC’s real-time optimizations rapidly during the control process. This technique uses the Hamiltonian method to derive a set of equations with multiple variables. To solve these in a real-time application, the Newton/GMRES method applies forward-difference generalized minimal residual (fdgmres) algorithm. \nThe simulation and experimental result using a commercial drone, called AR.Drone 2.0, in our laboratory instrumented by a Vicon Vantage motion capture system, demonstrate that our feedback-based control method’s performance highly depends on the reliability of the state vector feedback signals. As a result, a Kalman filter and Luenberger observer algorithms are used for estimating unknown states. The NMPC-based controller operation is simulated, and the result reveals the similar efficiency of observers. Moreover, the NMPC control approach is compared with a proportional controller which shows great improvements in the response of the quadrotor. The experiment showed that our control method is sufficiently fast for practical implementations, and it can solve the trajectory tracking problem properly even for complex paths. This thesis is concluded by stating a summary of contributions and some potential future works.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".