Evaluation of epoxy grout for roller path repairing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Manitoba Hydro owns and operates 12 river hydroelectric generating stations ans two major control structures. The structures control the flow of water almost exclusively with gate wheels. It is important for the roller paths to remain true to allow uniform distribution of the hydraulic load on the gates to the gate wheels. Manitoba Hydro is currently replacing the distorted steel roller paths at its MacArthur Generating Station. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the physical properties of high strength proprietary grouts to determine their adequacy for use beneath new roller paths of water control gates which have unusual spacial constraints. Two full size mockups of a portion of an existing guide, with a steel overlay, were utilized in the experimental study. To investigate the stress-strain distribution in the mockup under specific loading condition, strain gauges were installed on both of the web sides of the embedded steel I-beam: one group of gauges was located just below the flange, the others were located along the mid-hight of the beam web. Force gauges were inserted to measure the pressure between the thin grout layer bottom and the top of the embedded I-beam. A special LVDT (linear variable differential transducer) assembly was made to measure the maximum displacement of grout layer. Mockup samples were subjected to static and cyclic loading procedures at two designated loading points. The grout cylindrical creep tests were conducted at the same time. It included tests at room temperature and at the elevated temperature of 50°C. The initial sustained load was 50% of the ultimate compression strength of the grout cylinder (3"x6"). Once the creep development was observed to become constant, the sustained load was raised up to 70% of ultimate strength and held constant until the end of the test. The test results indicate that the strength of the proposed grouting material is adequate to resist the required load, both statically and cyclically. Temperature has no significant effects on this specific loading situation. The proposed grouting method is proven to be simple, economic and efficient, therefore, the technique is suitable for roller path repairing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".