MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7000437192

Exploring Farm Succession and Transition Challenges and Opportunities on Wolfe Island

2025· dissertation· en· W7000437192 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2025
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRural development and sustainability
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFocus groupGenerativityAgricultureSustainabilityEcological successionThematic analysisNatural resource
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research aims to identify the following: what challenges and prospects face farm succession and transition on Wolfe Island? And: how might farm succession and transition influence the future of alternative farming on Wolfe Island? Wolfe Island is situated at the entrance of the St. Lawrence River from Lake Ontario, acting as a natural boundary between Kingston, ON and Northern New York State. The majority of farming on the Island is generational beef, corn, grain, and soy farms. Farm succession/transition involves one inheriting the previous owner’s rights and ownership of a piece of land. I used the generativity framework to address these questions, which examines efforts to guide the next generation. Eight interviews and a focus group identified future agricultural pursuits on Wolfe Island. The interviews were categorized into two groups of participants: generational and new farmers. Five generational farmer interviews consisted of the current farmer(s)/farm owners in the family along with an adult relative of the next generation; this structure allowed me to observe dynamics across generations. The three new farmer interviews, involving individuals who have been farming on Wolfe Island for under ten years, allowed for new agricultural perspectives to be obtained. Four interviewees took part in the focus group, where topics surrounding sustainable farming on the Island, including farm livelihoods, environmental health, and local food systems, were discussed collaboratively. Thematic analysis and a combination of inductive and deductive reasoning were used to identify the key ideas and trends emerging across the interviews and focus group. The findings identified how generativity is present regardless of clear or unclear lines of succession or being a new farmer and how strong community connections are the foundation of a robust farming community and integral for the sharing of agricultural knowledge. This research also revealed the challenges farmers face when operating a farm, such as high production costs, and demonstrates how agriculture programs and policies, such as appropriate succession planning guides and supports for new and young farmers, could help mitigate the decline of the farming industry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.965
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)Same topicRural development and sustainabilityFrench-language works237,207