Fenotipo ampliado del autismo y habilidades pragmáticas en padres y madres de niños con y sin trastorno del espectro autista
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The broader autism phenotype (BAP) has been defined as subclinical traits that configure the phenotypic expression of genetic susceptibility to the development of Autistic Spectrum Disorder (ASD). The literature has pointed to the relationship between communicative-pragmatic skills and autism. However, there is controversy as to whether these skills constitute a specific feature of the BAP. Still, research with first-degree relatives of people with ASD has not yet been successful in establishing definitive markers. Thus, this study compared the performance of parents of children with (n=26) and without ASD (n=26) in communicative-pragmatic skills tasks and BAP indicators. The Broader Autism Phenotype Questionnaire (BAPQ) and subtests of the Montreal Communication Evaluation Battery (MAC Battery), and the Wechsler Abbreviated Intelligence Scale (WASI) were applied. The results indicated that parents of children with ASD had greater difficulty in the pragmatic language of the bapq, although they did not meet the criteria for bap and in communicative-pragmatic skills of conversational speech, emotional prosody, metaphor interpretation, and indirect speech acts. The clinical group also presented a lower verbal IQ score compared to the non-clinical group. It is concluded that greater difficulties in cognitive-pragmatic skills may be a central and probably specific aspect of the BAP in family members of children with ASD, as well as difficulties in structural aspects of language, such as verbal intelligence. These results have implications for understanding the possible influence of familiar sociocognitive factors on the genesis of autism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".