MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7000508921

Fast Forward 016: Christina van Bohemen + Teena Hale-Pennington

2016· other· en· W7000508921 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Auckland Data Repository · 2016
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicArchitecture and Computational Design
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKey (lock)Position (finance)Quarter (Canadian coin)Architecture
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Profession Today. In May 2016 Christina van Bohemen took up the position of President of the New Zealand Institute of Architects (NZIA). She is only the second woman elected to this position, the first having been Helen Tippett over a quarter of a century ago. With Teena Hale-Pennington as its Chief Executive Officer, the NZIA now has women in both of its key leadership roles. It is a historic time across architecture and engineering as IPENZ also has a female President and CEO. In this session, Christina and Teena will discuss key issues facing the profession today and their vision for its future direction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.290
Threshold uncertainty score0.970

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2900.179

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Auckland Data RepositorySame topicArchitecture and Computational DesignFrench-language works237,207