MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7000541227

Exploring the Intersection Between Sex- and Gender-based Considerations and Exercise-based Telerehabilitation in Individuals with Stroke

2024· dissertation· en· W7000541227 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMacSphere (McMaster University) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMichael Smith Health Research BCMcMaster UniversityFondation Brain Canada
KeywordsTelerehabilitationPsychosocialRehabilitationIntersection (aeronautics)Stroke (engine)Intervention (counseling)TelemedicineMEDLINE
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sex- and gender-based factors disproportionally impact stroke recovery in women, and thus there is an urgent need for rehabilitation scientists to consider innovative forms of delivering stroke rehabilitation to optimize their participation, physical and psychosocial outcomes. Telerehabilitation which involves minimal travel requirements and costs may help overcome barriers related to accessing rehabilitation services. This PhD thesis is comprised of three studies that had an overarching aim of examining the intersection between sex- and gender-based considerations and exercise-based telerehabilitation among individuals with stroke. The first study was a scoping review of 38 primary research studies exploring facilitators and barriers to participation in exercise-based telerehabilitation in men and women with stroke. We reported many facilitators related to environmental factors including variety of games or exercises, convenience/flexibility of the training schedule, accessibility, strong communication skills possessed by therapists, and self-reported improvements in physical function. Challenges with internet connectivity and wearing and/or adjusting the technological device(s) used were the most commonly reported barriers. Both men and women reported being satisfied with the intervention components and possessed knowledge to participate. The second study aimed to explore participants’ experiences with a synchronously-delivered 4-week lower extremity-focused telerehabilitation program. Participants corroborated many of the facilitators identified in our scoping review, in addition to telerehabilitation providing opportunities to extend the continuum of stroke recovery. The third study included multiple case studies of 6 participants involved with the 4-week exercise-based telerehabilitation, whereby we explored sex- and gender-based factors that could potentially explain the responses in performance-based strength and health-related quality of life. We reported that factors such as stroke type and marital status of female participants could have helped explain their more favourable responses in contrast to males. Overall, this thesis provided preliminary evidence of the use of telerehabilitation as a viable means of delivering stroke rehabilitation to women.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacSphere (McMaster University)→Same topicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery→French-language works237,207→