The evolution of Canada's foreing trade (2000-2020). Special atention to its relationship with te USA = Evolución del comercio exterior de Canadá (2000-2020). Especial atención a su relación con EE.UU
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Canada becomes an independent country in 1867, and from there on, its process of transformation and economic development starts. The country’s economic expansion is based on foreign trade, through cooperation, the establishment of trade relations and Free Trade Agreements with different trading partners. Throughout this process, immigration has been essential for Canada’s development, as well as for its evolution as a society. In this context, the following paper analyzes the evolution of Canada's foreign trade from2000 to 2020. Specifically, the first part establishes a context that analyzes the economic structure of the country and its commercial relations with the outside. While, in the second part, an empirical study of Canada's foreign trade is carried out during the studied period. First, through an aggregated analysis and its main indicators. Then, in order to identify its main trading partners, through a geographically disaggregated analysis of the country's imports and exports. And finally, a disaggregated analysis by products of the exchanged volumes between Canada and its main trading partner, the USA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".