MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7000622597

Genome Wide Association Study of Soybean [(Glycine max (L.) Merr.] Germplasm Derived from Canadian X Chinese Crosses to Mine for Unique Seed-Yield Alleles

2021· dissertation· en· W7000622597 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoybean genetics and cultivation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermplasmAlleleGenotypeCultivarGenetic diversityInbred strainGene poolGenetic association
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The phenotypic and genotypic evaluation of exotic soybean [(Glycine max (L.) Merr.] germplasm could help widen the North American germplasm pool. The objective of this thesis was to identify novel alleles underlying seed yield, seed protein and oil concentration from a genomic diversity panel consisting of recombinant inbred lines (RIL) derived from several generations of bi-parental crosses between elite Canadian x Chinese cultivars (CD-CH). A total of 200 genotypes were evaluated in the field at Elora and Woodstock, Ontario, in 2019 and 2020. For seed yield, the CD-CH genotypes yielded significantly more than the elite Canadian and Chinese genotypes. For oil and protein concentrations, the performance of CD-CH group was similar to that of elite Canadian cultivars. A putative candidate gene was identified for each of the evaluated traits. Elucidation of the genetics underlying seed yield and seed quality traits from exotic germplasm sources would greatly benefit future breeders in their efforts for continued improvement of the crop.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.730
Threshold uncertainty score0.537

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)Same topicSoybean genetics and cultivationFrench-language works237,207