MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7000662698

Genetic Dissection of Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] Seed Composition in Populations Derived from Edamame × Food-Grade Crosses

2022· dissertation· en· W7000662698 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2022
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoybean genetics and cultivation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuantitative trait locusCultivarInbred strainRaffinosePopulationSingle-nucleotide polymorphismTraitMicrosatellite
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Soybean seed size and concentrations of protein, oil, sucrose, stachyose, and raffinose are major breeding targets to improve quality. The objectives of this study were to quantify genetic, environment, and genotype-by-environment effects on the stated traits, and to identify and validate quantitative trait loci (QTL) associated with them. Recombinant inbred lines (RILs) derived from two crosses between high-performing food-grade soybeans and imported high-protein edamame (MF1 x OAC Ramsay, and MF1 x DH410) were grown in four Southern Ontario environments. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers were generated for RILs using genotyping-by-sequencing. Construction of linkage groups and QTL analyses were done using IciMapping software. Significant genotype-by-environment interactions were found for seed size but no other traits. In total, 94 QTL were discovered underlying the traits of interest, 14 of which were identified in another population or environment. The findings of this study can assist breeders in developing cultivars with improved seed quality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)Same topicSoybean genetics and cultivationFrench-language works237,207