MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7000670440

Foundation design challenges of the MCR-A skirted gravity platform

2010· article· en· W7000670440 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueUWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMusic Technology and Sound Studies
Canadian institutionsArup Group (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubmarine pipelineDeckFoundation (evidence)Offshore geotechnical engineeringBase (topology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The MCR-A platform is a skirted gravity base platform to be installed in the Caspian Sea offshore Turkmenistan in ground conditions composed of stiff clay Advanced 3D numerical analysis was required to adequately model the annular geometry and high environmental loading on the substructure. High suction pressures are needed to install the skirts to the depth necessary for foundation stability. The high suction pressures required a complex skirt stiffener arrangement and this posed challenges in quantifying the penetration resistance to be overcome in order to ensure the required skirt penetration could be achieved. In addition, the presence of spudcan footprint 'craters' in the direct vicinity of the platform resulting from previous jack-up operations required special design consideration. The approaches carried out to overcome these geotechnical design challenges are described in this paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.118
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia)Same topicMusic Technology and Sound StudiesFrench-language works237,207