I comportamenti devianti e criminali dei digital native: \nuna riflessione comparata in materia di \ncyberbullismo e sexting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Over the past twenty years, the Internet has become an integral part of people’s lives, especially young people, the socalled digital natives. Children and adolescent have eagerly embraced its potential for communication, entertainment and information-seeking. Today, minors grow up in a technology-mediated environment and are especially attracted by the possibilities of the Web. For them, the distinction between online and offline has increasingly become meaningless, and they move effortlessly between the two. This opens tremendous prospects that were unimaginable only half a generation ago. While such availability would uniformly be seen as positive, there are increasing concerns about the risks that access to technology might bring for young people. \nThis massive use of ICTs by children and adolescents represents a circumstance not devoid of legal relevance. As a matter of fact, the Internet revolution has brought about a change in the criminological scenario, especially in relation to young people. \nThis work intends to investigate the new virtual phenomena characterizing the digital natives and known as cyberbullying and sexting, adopting an interdisciplinary research approach. Following an in-depth investigation into the sociological and criminological aspects that characterize the phenomena, the research provides an evaluation of the current legal framework at the international, European and national level in relation to the protection of minors in the digital world. \nConsequently, on the basis of a comparative analysis involving common law (Australia, Canada) and civil law (Spain, Italy) systems, the study aspires firstly to identity the legal issues and debates arose by cyberbullying and sexting, estimating the effectiveness of the criminal justice model in relation to these types of criminal and deviant behaviours. Secondly, it aims to reflect on the role of criminal law in relation to the new challenges posed by the cyberspace.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".