History on the Web / L’Histoire sur le Web
Bibliographic record
Abstract
a l A s s o c i a t i o n • S o c i é t é h i s t o r i q u e d u C a n a d a 40 400 ans de présence française au Canada, 1604-2004Focus : La présence française au Canada remonte à quelque 400 ans.Au XVII e siècle, les grandes puissances européennes se disputent l'Amériquej pour repousser toujours plus loin les frontières de leur empire colonial.La France participe à ce projet de conquête territoriale à l'instar de ses rivaux, l'Angleterre, l'Espagne, le Portugal et les Pays-Bas.Jusqu'à la Conquête britannique de 1760, la Nouvelle-France recouvre la majeure partie de l'Amérique du Nord.Conçus et construits par le Centre d'études acadiennes de l'Université de Moncton (CEA), le Centre de recherche en civilisation canadiennefrançaise de l'Université d'Ottawa (CRCCF) et la Société historique de Saint-Boniface (SHSB), les trois sites Internet ci-dessous retracent l'évolution de la présence française au Canada depuis quatre siècles.Ce projet cherche à mettre en valeur la richesse du patrimoine historique et culturel des communautés francophones et acadiennes du Canada en rendant accessbiles au grand public de nombreux documents d'archives inédits.Le CEA, le CRCCF et la SHSB ont pu réaliser ce projet grâce à une subvention du Programme de culture canadienne en ligne du ministère du Patrimoine canadien.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.047 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".