Hadronic parity violation and neutron capture reactions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The hadronic weak interaction remains one of the most poorly understood sectors of the Standard Model; for obvious reasons. On the one hand, the initial and final states involve strongly bound systems of particles, for which the theoretical description (e.g. QCD) is insufficient itself and all of the current alternative or hybrid approaches are phenomenological and therefore depend on experimental input. On the other hand, experimental tests are notoriously difficult because the weak interaction observables are suppressed by the strong interaction and very high statistics measurements are needed to reach a meaningful accuracy, which in turn requires tight control of systematic uncertainties. All of this is true for both strangeness-conserving (ΔS = 0) and strangeness-changing (ΔS = 1) nonleptonic interactions. In the former category, new high intensity neutron facilities \nand the experiments that are proposed or are in preparation there promise sensitivities that could finally see non-zero parity violating (PV) effects in systems that have a theoretically clean interpretation. This paper provides a brief description of the physics issues and various models and introduces a few experimental efforts that are currently underway.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".