MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7001025389

“I FEEL LIKE I NEED TO GO BACK TO MY VILLAGE, BUT WHERE’S MY VILLAGE?” A PHOTOVOICE EXPLORATION OF THE EXPERIENCES OF HARM REDUCTION FROM COMMUNITY YOUTH IN SASKATOON, SASKATCHEWAN

2023· dissertation· en· W7001025389 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSemiotics and Representation Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHarm reductionHarmPhotovoiceMental healthSnowball samplingCommunity healthFocus groupPublic health
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: While a singular, conclusive definition of harm reduction does not exist, the vast majority of harm reduction literature focuses on the historical roots of harm reduction, specifically related to substance use. Harm reduction is ultimately about meeting people where they are at in their health journey and supporting them in their path toward well-being. This health journey could look different for everyone, indicating the necessity for a range of supports such as nutrition, housing, hygiene, health care, health education, counselors, and cultural support. However, what is often missing from discussions about harm reduction are the perspectives of youth.\nObjective: The present study explored youth experiences of harm reduction from the perspective of urban Community Youth in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. The present study examined the supports and barriers these youth encounter in taking up harm reduction for themselves or to support their loved ones (e.g., friends, family members, significant others).\nMethods: This community-based, phenomenological study was conducted in collaboration with Chokecherry Studios, The Students Commission of Canada, and a Youth Advisory Committee. Using a snowball sampling strategy, four youth between the ages of 18-23 who live in Saskatoon were recruited. Participants captured photographs that represented their experiences with seeking harm reduction for themselves or their loved ones and participated in either two group or one-on-one interviews to discuss their experiences concerning the photographs.\nResults: Results indicate five superordinate themes best accounted for participant interpretations of their experiences: (Supports) Seeking Support, Meeting Basic Needs, and Harms Reducing Harms; (Barriers) Community Disconnection and Stigma. Together, these themes represent how Community Youth were supported and impeded in their uptake of harm reduction.\nDiscussion: Implications of findings contribute to a wider understanding of harm reduction, acknowledging the historical basis that substance use has in harm reduction, while moving towards a wider, more comprehensive understanding of how harm, harm reduction, and harm reduction uptake are experienced by Community Youth in their everyday lives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.159
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it