MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7001045832

Indigenous Knowledge and Salmon-Safe Certification at Vancouver International Airport

2022· article· en· W7001045832 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueWestern CEDAR (Western Washington University) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCertificationStewardship (theology)IndigenousSustainabilityTraditional knowledgeInternational airport
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Located on more than 3,300 acres on Sea Island in BC, the ancestral and unceded territory of the Musqueam people, and servicing more than 26.4 million passengers in 2019, YVR is one of Canada’s largest and busiest airports. In 2016, YVR was certified for a 5-year period as Salmon-Safe, a designation that serves to weave together the environmental stewardship of Sea Island to ensure the protection of the Fraser River, one of the most important salmon-bearing rivers in the world. In 2017, YVR and the Musqueam Indian Band signed a Sustainability & Friendship Agreement a 30-year agreement based on friendship and respect to achieve a sustainable and mutually beneficial future. With the Salmon-Safe certification up for reassessment, YVR, the Fraser Basin Council and the Musqueam community sought to enhance the recertification process by including indigenous knowledge. In this session, learn more about how the three parties worked to bring together western science and indigenous knowledge to better understand the our relationships with the land and the water and explore what is possible in the next 5-year certification period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.204
Threshold uncertainty score0.410

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0190.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWestern CEDAR (Western Washington University)Same topicIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsFrench-language works237,207