How the Fashion and Luxury Industry Challenges the Crisis Redesigning Value Chains
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The fashion and luxury industry is part of the Made in Italy fashion system that represents an important constituent of the Italian industrial system,\nwhere Italian apparel sector represents 7.1% of the national manufacturing industry turnover, with 516,700 employees, 59,750 firms and total\nrevenues of 52,835 million euro in 2006. However, the industry turnover has been -15.1% in the first quarter of 2009, due to the global crisis and\nfierce low labour cost country competition. This research project aims at studying Italian fashion and luxury apparel firms to: understand how\ncompanies can react to the current crisis in order to remain competitive; to explain how companies can redesign their value chain to improve their\nefficiency; and to\nevaluate new managerial and organizational models that support business development. The multiple-case study method is adopted to investigate\nthese research questions. We conducted 12 in-depth case studies using a semi-structured interview protocol specifically designed for this research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".