MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7001068516

Historiografía e invención: Wamba en el "Libro de las Generaciones"

2011· article· en· W7001068516 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueUVaDOC UVaDOC University of Valladolid Documentary Repository (University of Valladolid) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval Iberian Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Action (physics)Domain (mathematical analysis)Work (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En este trabajo se estudia la tradición y creación de un relato sin apenas trasfondo histórico sobre el rey visigodo Wamba, en el que se le presenta como labrador y que sitúa su elección como el producto de un designio divino. La obra en la que figura por vez primera esta narración es el Libro de las generaciones, redactada en Navarra hacia los años 1256-1270, que ofrece también, entre otras características, un relato bastante singular sobre la historia visigoda. Se intenta mostrar aquí cómo el relato sobre Wamba resulta indesligable de las modificaciones que presenta el propio Libro de las generaciones, por lo que debe entenderse como una creación propia de esta obra, con un importante alcance político e institucional. En efecto, tal relato se enfrenta a otras narraciones políticas en Navarra, como la que abre el Fuero antiguo, adquiriendo de ese modo una profunda significación en su contexto.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.418
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it