Indicators of individual and population health in the Vancouver island Marmot (Marmota Vancouverensis)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Vancouver Island Marmot (Marmota vancouverensis) is an endangered rodent endemic to the mountains of Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada. Following population declines in the 1980s and 1990s, an intensive captive breeding and reintroduction program was initiated involving three Canadian zoos and a purpose-built, subalpine facility on Vancouver Island.\nFrom 1997 to 2017, 660 marmots were associated with the captive program, including 63 wild-born individuals captured for breeding and 597 marmots born and weaned in captivity. Reintroductions began in 2003 and by 2017 a total of 501 marmots had been released. Although this significantly increased the wild population from its low point in 2003, conservation of the Vancouver Island Marmot (VIM) continues to involve intensive ex situ management, reintroductions, and translocations.\nHealth and disease surveillence is fundamental to the success of conservation programs like the marmot recovery project. This thesis builds upon our understanding of VIM health by describing and evaluating select health parameters, to determine baseline characteristics for VIM under its different treatments (wild, captive and captive-release) and to identify potential risk factors that may influence the health of the marmot’s population and its capacity to achieve recovery objectives. The analysis involved data that was collected between 1992 and 2016, and included 1,106 VIM blood profiles, 3,174 physical examinations, 140 post mortem examinations and 533 field mortality records.\nVIM hematology and serum biochemistry reference ranges were calculated as a baseline metric and were qualitatively comparable to published values for other\nrodent species. Leukogram and protein values were found to have potential utility as a quantitative measure for comparing VIM management groups.\nThere were significant differences in the clinical and pathological data collected from captive and free-ranging (captive-release and wild) marmots. Captives could be monitored with greater intensity and to an older age, due to increased longevity. A host of clinical and pathological disorders were described in captive marmots, including age-related, management-related, and congenital problems. There was a paucity of health conditions identified in free-ranging VIM and this could be due to a fundamental lack of disease, or limited opportunities to conduct post mortem examinations or evaluate compromised individuals in the field.\nThe analysis did not identify any specific infectious agents that represented a generalized population threat to VIM. Cardiomyopathy and neoplasia, which occurred in older individuals, were the most consequential health complications for captive marmots. Implantation of abdominal radio-transmitters was not found to impact marmot health and was important for identifying mortalities in the field. The first wild hibernation represented a time of significant mortality for VIM released from captivity. However, reintroduced marmots that survived their first year in the wild were comparable to their wild-born counterparts with respect to hibernation success and clinical presentation. Predators continued to represent a major cause of mortality for free-ranging marmots. In the absence of other identified health threats, predation and reduced hibernation success of captive-release marmots appear to be significant factors limiting the health and potential recovery of the in situ population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".