MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7001075133

Indicators of individual and population health in the Vancouver island Marmot (Marmota Vancouverensis)

2018· article· en· W7001075133 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueArca (British Columbia Electronic Library Network) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopulationMarmotOcclusive arterial diseaseEctothermDisease
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Vancouver Island Marmot (Marmota vancouverensis) is an endangered rodent endemic to the mountains of Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada. Following population declines in the 1980s and 1990s, an intensive captive breeding and reintroduction program was initiated involving three Canadian zoos and a purpose-built, subalpine facility on Vancouver Island.\nFrom 1997 to 2017, 660 marmots were associated with the captive program, including 63 wild-born individuals captured for breeding and 597 marmots born and weaned in captivity. Reintroductions began in 2003 and by 2017 a total of 501 marmots had been released. Although this significantly increased the wild population from its low point in 2003, conservation of the Vancouver Island Marmot (VIM) continues to involve intensive ex situ management, reintroductions, and translocations.\nHealth and disease surveillence is fundamental to the success of conservation programs like the marmot recovery project. This thesis builds upon our understanding of VIM health by describing and evaluating select health parameters, to determine baseline characteristics for VIM under its different treatments (wild, captive and captive-release) and to identify potential risk factors that may influence the health of the marmot’s population and its capacity to achieve recovery objectives. The analysis involved data that was collected between 1992 and 2016, and included 1,106 VIM blood profiles, 3,174 physical examinations, 140 post mortem examinations and 533 field mortality records.\nVIM hematology and serum biochemistry reference ranges were calculated as a baseline metric and were qualitatively comparable to published values for other\nrodent species. Leukogram and protein values were found to have potential utility as a quantitative measure for comparing VIM management groups.\nThere were significant differences in the clinical and pathological data collected from captive and free-ranging (captive-release and wild) marmots. Captives could be monitored with greater intensity and to an older age, due to increased longevity. A host of clinical and pathological disorders were described in captive marmots, including age-related, management-related, and congenital problems. There was a paucity of health conditions identified in free-ranging VIM and this could be due to a fundamental lack of disease, or limited opportunities to conduct post mortem examinations or evaluate compromised individuals in the field.\nThe analysis did not identify any specific infectious agents that represented a generalized population threat to VIM. Cardiomyopathy and neoplasia, which occurred in older individuals, were the most consequential health complications for captive marmots. Implantation of abdominal radio-transmitters was not found to impact marmot health and was important for identifying mortalities in the field. The first wild hibernation represented a time of significant mortality for VIM released from captivity. However, reintroduced marmots that survived their first year in the wild were comparable to their wild-born counterparts with respect to hibernation success and clinical presentation. Predators continued to represent a major cause of mortality for free-ranging marmots. In the absence of other identified health threats, predation and reduced hibernation success of captive-release marmots appear to be significant factors limiting the health and potential recovery of the in situ population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.687
Threshold uncertainty score0.981

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArca (British Columbia Electronic Library Network)Same topicAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesFrench-language works237,207