MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7001088277

Increasing Support for Opioid Exposed Newborns: A Quality Improvement Project

2020· article· en· W7001088277 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarWorks -A service of University of Vermont Libraries (University of Vermont) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpioidQuality managementData collectionQuarter (Canadian coin)AbstinenceStakeholderOpioid overdose
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Problem Statement Opioid exposed newborns, who may develop neonatal abstinence syndrome, benefit from non-pharmacological care, such as holding or “cuddling”. It is difficult for parents and staff at University of Vermont Children’s Hospital to provide adequate cuddling to fulfill all opioid exposed newborns’ needs. This project aimed to increase access to cuddling for opioid exposed newborns in the newborn nursery of University of Vermont Children’s Hospital so that 50% of newborns assessed to benefit from cuddling were cuddled by March 1st, 2020. Methods Quality improvement methodology was employed - including identifying aims, measures, and ideas for change - by conducting stakeholder interviews and creating a process map and key driver diagram. Ideas for change were implemented through “plan do study act” cycles. A mixed methods approach was used to analyze quantitative and qualitative data from the pre-intervention and post-intervention period. Descriptive data will be provided for each outcome, process, and balancing measure. Results Baseline nurse survey estimates indicated only 8.7% of opioid exposed newborns assessed to benefit from cuddling accessed cuddling in the pre-intervention period. Less than one quarter of nurses reported ever using cuddlers, most needs were overnight, and most nurses predicted using cuddlers would decrease their workload. At one month, there were 53 cuddling sessions reported and 11 volunteers cuddled in the newborn nursery. Results of follow up survey are pending. Conclusion As a result of this project, initial data may indicate increased access to cuddling for the opioid exposed infants. Most volunteers report neutral or satisfied with the program, although there are often no newborns to cuddle in the nursery during current shifts. Over the coming months, we anticipate expanding the hours to match unit needs, branching out to inpatient pediatrics to help with cuddling and decrease overlap, and training more volunteers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.044
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.037
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.235

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0440.037
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0030.010
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarWorks -A service of University of Vermont Libraries (University of Vermont)Same topicPrenatal Substance Exposure EffectsFrench-language works237,207