MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7001094088

Iconography of the Newfoundland quilt:
\npiecing together meaning on the Great Northern Peninsula

2011· dissertation· en· W7001094088 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University) · 2011
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCrafts, Textile, and Design
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuiltQuiltingCraftIconographyMeaning (existential)Symbol (formal)Peninsula
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Newfoundland Quilt is part of a pervasive textile-based craft practice on the
\nNorthern Peninsula of Newfoundland. This quilt type consists of between sixteen and
\nthirty fabric blocks, each block containing an iconic symbol or scene that is of
\ncontemporary and/or historical relevance to outport Newfoundland. This thesis highlights
\nsome of the more commonly quilted icons in order to demonstrate the ways in which an
\nindividual might use a quilt 's surface to express a range of regional values, nostalgic
\nsentiments, and personal beliefs. In discussing these factors, this thesis also highlights
\nquilting as a textile tradition in Newfoundland, by demonstrating the ways it has
\nundergone shifts in form, function and meaning, as the culture itself has faced myriad
\nchanges. Since the majority of people who make these quilts are at a post-retirement age,
\nthis study connects quilting practices to advance stages of life, as the quilts become a way
\nfor older people to address the inevitable changes they have witnessed to their culture, to
\ntheir physical bodies, and to the places that they call home. The Newfoundland Quilt type
\nis therefore emblematic of the ways in which individuals use creativity to help generate
\nand affirm of both individual and shared senses of identity, meanwhile helping them to
\nconfront the changes to the culture around them.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.826
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)Same topicCrafts, Textile, and DesignFrench-language works237,207