MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7001121940

Improving speed of transmission line protection: exploring the use of dynamic phasors, transients, and incremental components

2024· dissertation· en· W7001121940 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Systems Fault Detection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhasorElectric power transmissionRelayTransmission lineInductanceFault (geology)Protective relayControl theory (sociology)Electric power systemPower-system protection
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High penetration of inverter-based resources (IBRs) in modern power grids reduces system inertia and short circuit levels, emphasizing the need for fast and reliable transmission line protection to maintain grid stability. This thesis presents novel algorithms to improve the speed and reliability of line distance protection and faulted phase selection. This thesis explores two new approaches to improve the speed of line distance protection. The first algorithm uses the dynamic phasor model of a transmission line and the dynamic phasors of the measured currents and voltages to estimate the impedance from the relay location to the fault point. The second line protection algorithm uses the Clarke equivalent networks of a transmission line and the Clarke components of instantaneous incremental currents to estimate the inductance and the resistance from the relay location to the fault point and compare them against the reach settings. The algorithm employs least squares estimation to determine fault loop inductance and resistance. This algorithm is faster than the traditional phasor-based protection algorithms and remains consistent irrespective of fault location and fault resistance while maintaining equal or better dependability and security. The thesis also examines the problem of determining fault type and faulted phases and proposes two new algorithms. The first algorithm uses current transients in a selected frequency band. A set of indices is computed considering various ratios of the rate of change of the Clarke components of these bandpass-filtered currents. The algorithm makes the decisions based on the values of these indices calculated within a short time window of 0.75 ms after detecting a fault. The second algorithm determines the faulted phases based on the ratios of the rate of change of instantaneous incremental currents computed using a pair of phases at a time, offering simpler implementation and reliable identification within 6 ms. The performance of the proposed algorithms was validated through extensive simulation studies. The new protection algorithms presented in this thesis can improve the speed of operation of transmission line protection without compromising reliability and requiring expensive highly specialized hardware.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)Same topicPower Systems Fault DetectionFrench-language works237,207