MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7001152790

Integrated Scheduling Problems in Healthcare and
\nLogistics

2020· dissertation· en· W7001152790 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSpectrum Research Repository (Concordia University) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicForensic Fingerprint Detection Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDynamic priority schedulingScheduling (production processes)Fair-share schedulingJob shop schedulingNurse scheduling problemTwo-level schedulingRate-monotonic schedulingInteger programmingRound-robin scheduling
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Scheduling is one of the important components of operation management in different services. The goal of scheduling is to allocate limited available resources over time for performing a set of activities such that one or more objectives are optimized. In this thesis, we study several interesting applications of scheduling in health care and logistics. We present several formulations and algorithms to efficiently solve the scheduling problems that arise in these areas. \n \nWe first study static and dynamic variants of a multi-appointment, multi-stage outpatient scheduling problem that arises in oncology clinics offering chemotherapy treatments. We present two integer programming formulations that integrate numerous scheduling decisions, features, and objectives of a major outpatient cancer treatment clinic in Canada. We also develop integrated and sequential scheduling strategies for the dynamic case in which arriving requests are processed at specific points of time. \nThe results of computational experiments show that the proposed scheduling strategies can achieve significant improvements with respect to the several performance measures compared to the current scheduling procedure used at the clinic. \n \nWe next present a daily outpatient appointment scheduling problem that simultaneously determines the start times of consultation and chemotherapy treatment appointments for different types of patients in an oncology clinic under uncertain treatment times. We formulate this stochastic problem using two two-stage stochastic programming models. We also propose a sample average approximation algorithm to obtain high quality feasible solutions. We use an efficient specialized algorithm that quickly evaluates any given first-stage solution for a large number of scenarios. We perform several computational experiments to compare the performance of proposed two-stage stochastic programming models. In the next part of the experiments, we show that the quality of the first-stage solutions obtained by the sample average approximation is significantly higher than those of the expected value problem, and the value of stochastic solution is extremely high specially for higher degrees of uncertainty. \n \nFinally, we address two variants of a cross-dock scheduling problem with handling times that simultaneously determines dock-door assignments and the scheduling of the trucks. In the general variant of the problem we assume that unit-load transfer times are door dependent, whereas in the specific case variant, unit-load transfer times are considered to be identical for all pairs of doors. We present constraint programming formulations for both variants of the problem, and we compare the performance of these models with mixed integer programming models from the literature. For the specific case, we propose several families of valid inequalities that are then used within a branch-and-cut framework to improve the performance of a time-index model. To solve the general problem efficiently, we also develop an approximate algorithm that first solves the specific case problem with the developed branch-and-cut algorithm to obtain a valid lower-bound, and then applies a matheuristic to obtain a valid upper-bound for the general problem and to compute the optimality gap. According to the computational experiments, we show that the proposed formulations and algorithms are able to solve the studied problems efficiently, and they outperform other models and heuristics that were previously developed for the problem in the literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)Same topicForensic Fingerprint Detection MethodsFrench-language works237,207