MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7001154427

Impact of Performance Audit on Public Organisations: 
\nThe Study of The Indonesian Central Government

2020· other· en· W7001154427 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueNottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham) · 2020
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerformance auditAuditJoint auditAccountabilityPublic sectorAudit planChief audit executiveInefficiencyContext (archaeology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Compared to the traditional financial and compliance audit, performance audit is a relatively new innovation that emerges amidst the escalating concern to public accountability. Government corruption, Economic distress, and public service inefficiency are considered as the catalyst that motivates the general public to demand better performance and greater accountability in the public sector. One instrument to fulfil the public demand is by implementing the performance audit. The practice of performance audit in Indonesia was mandated to Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan (BPK) that act as the Indonesian Supreme Audit Organisation. Since the performance audit has been performed in Indonesia in since two decades ago the study will try to examine to what extent the performance audit has generated impact to the audited organisation namely the Economic Ministries in Indonesia. The study limits the performance audit period conducted from 2012-2017. The impact was measured using the perceptions of staff of the audited organisation which captured using survey instrument employing a five-category Likert-type scale. A total of 75 questionnaires were distributed and 51 feedback was received and considered valid. The findings of the study are quite surprising since it displayed a significant impact was experienced by the auditees. The results substantially differ with the prior research conducted in the context of Pan-Canadian and Scandinavian public sector which only shows trivial and minimal impact. Although the auditees perception considered to be more objective, it should also be considered as the study limitation since there is a possibility of the respondents to embellish the fact with the tendency to minimise or maximise the influence that auditors might have on them. Since the study of measurement of performance audit impact on the public organisation is not widely available, this study will enrich the literature of performance audit especially in the context of the Indonesian public sector.
\n
\n
\nKeywords: public sector, performance audit, impact of performance audit, survey, Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan; Supreme Audit Organisation, Indonesia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it