Influence of Omega-3 fatty acids on the learning ability of the Guide Dog during the training
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Some studies show the usefulness of supplementation with long chain poliunsatured fatty acids (LCPUFA) in puppies during training through the evaluation of the ability of learning and memory. The purpose of this preliminary study was to evaluate the effect of DHA supplementation on learning abilities in a group of future Guide Dogs for the Blind during the phases of education and training. Two groups of six Labrador dogs (A, study group and B, control group), belonging to School of Guide Dogs of Tuscany (Italy), random selected, were included in the study. To evaluate the effect of supplementation, we used the standardized tests of the School as they are internationally recognized and can establish both character and learning skills of puppies. Some differences were observed between the two groups in some tests results; in particular in those that require a greater visual and sensory capacity and motor coordination as the grid (or abnormal surface) test and the tilting table test. The results obtained in this study could confirm the usefulness of a 35 mg/kg DHA supplementation during the first year of life for improving cognitive skills in dogs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".