MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7001270862

International Taxation in Canada: Principles and Practices [2nd Edition]

2011· article· en· W7001270862 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeYLS (Yale Law School) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicTaxation and Legal Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternational taxationTax reformTax lawScope (computer science)Tax avoidanceDouble taxationDirect taxLegislatureIncome tax
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The second edition of International Taxation in Canada continues the journey of assisting the reader to understand Canada's international tax regime. The authors strive to do so as comprehensively as possible, without overwhelming their audience with the massive scope and complexity of the topic. The intended audience includes lawyers and law students in Canada as well as students of business, tax and accountancy.\nThe book continues to reflect the influences and experiences of the authors in teaching and practicing in the international tax area over an extended period of time. Substantively, the second edition includes updates on legislative changes and judicial decisions that are particularly helpful in illustrating how income tax principles accommodate international transactions. Tax rules have developed in the intervening years since the first edition. Some rules, in particular a proposed regime concerning foreign investment entities, have been completely abandoned. Conversely, others, such as those concerned with non-resident trusts and foreign affiliates, have been become more settled.\nNonetheless, Canada's international tax laws have become more and more complicated over time. This unique book provides an understanding of the main principles and practices that frame international tax rules, which will assist you when confronted with the seemingly endless tax complexities of cross-border transactions, along with an appreciation of how foreign tax laws interact with their Canadian counterparts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.563

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.011
Science and technology studies0.0080.003
Scholarly communication0.0100.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeYLS (Yale Law School)→Same topicTaxation and Legal Issues→French-language works237,207→