Key Considerations: COVID-19 in Informal Urban Settlements (March 2020) || 关键考虑因素：非正规城市住区中的2019冠状病毒病（2020年3月） || Consideraciones clave: el COVID-19 en asentamientos urbanos informales (marzo de 2020) || Considérations clés : Le COVID-19 dans les établissements urbains informels (mars 2020) || Considerações principais: COVID-19 em assentamentos urbanos informais (março de 2020)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This brief sets out key considerations for protecting informal urban settlements from the spread and impacts of COVID-19. There is heightened concern about these settings because of the combination of population density and limited infrastructure. This briefing discusses what is known about vulnerabilities and how to support local action. It can be viewed in conjunction with the Science in Humanitarian Action Platform (SSHAP) briefings on quarantine and social media. This brief was developed for SSHAP by the Institute of Development Studies (IDS) with contributions from the Global Challenges Research Fund (GCRF) Accountability for Informal Urban Equity Hub (ARISE), the Asian Coalition for Housing Rights, the International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), University College London (UCL) and the UCL/Development Planning Unit (DPU), University of Birmingham, University of Lincoln, University of Manchester, University of Warwick, WEIGO and York University (Canada). It was reviewed by colleagues at Anthrologica, IIED, University of Manchester, UCL/DPU, IFRC and UN-Habitat. The brief is the responsibility of the SSHAP.<br><br>Please note: there is an accompanying infographic summarising the key points from the briefing.<br><br>这份简报列出了保护非正规城市住区免受2019冠状病毒病散播和影响的关键考虑因素。由于非正规城市住区结合了人口密 度和基础设施紧绌的问题，增加了人们对这些环境的忧虑。本简报讨论了对相关脆弱性的已有知识以及如何支持本地层面 的行动。它可以与“人道主义行动中的科学”（SSHAP）已出版的隔离医学观察和社交媒体两份简报互相参照 。1 本简报由英国国际发展研究院（IDS）为SSHAP编制，并有下列机构的参与：全球挑战研究基金（GCRF）非正规城市公平问 责枢纽（ARISE）、亚洲住房权利联盟、国际环境与发展研究所（IIED）、伦敦大学学院（UCL）和伦敦大学学院巴特莱特 规划学院（UCL/DPU）、伯明翰大学、林肯大学、曼彻斯特大学、华威大学、全球化和组织化非正规就業妇女网络（WIEGO） 加拿大和约克大学。Anthrologica、IIED、曼彻斯特大学、UCL/DPU、红十字会与红新月会国际联合会（IFRC）和联合国人 类住区规划署（UN-Habitat）的同事审阅了本简报。SSHAP对本简报内容负全责。<br><br>Este informe presenta consideraciones clave para proteger los asentamientos urbanos informales de la propagación y los efectos del COVID-19. Existe una mayor preocupación sobre estos entornos debido a la combinación de la densidad de población y la limitada infraestructura. Este informe analiza lo que se sabe acerca de las vulnerabilidades y de qué manera apoyar la acción local. Se puede analizar en conjunto con los informes de la plataforma Social Science in Humanitarian Action Platform (SSHAP) sobre cuarentena y redes sociales. 1 Este resumen fue desarrollado para la plataforma SSHAP por el Institute of Development Studies (IDS) con los aportes de Accountability for Informal Urban Equity Hub (ARISE) de Global Challenges Research Fund (GCRF), Asian Coalition for Housing Rights, el Instituto Internacional de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo (IIED), University College London (UCL) y UCL/Unidad de Planificación del Desarrollo (DPU), la Universidad de Birmingham, Universidad de Lincoln, Universidad de Manchester, Universidad de Warwick, WIEGO y Universidad de York (Canadá). Fue revisado por colegas de Anthrologica, el IIED, la Universidad de Manchester, UCL/DPU, IFRC y ONU-Hábitat. El informe es responsabilidad de SSHAP.<br><br>Cette note stratégique énonce des considérations pratiques inhérentes à la protection des établissements urbains informels contre la propagation et les impacts du COVID-19. Ces environnements suscitent des préoccupations accrues en raison de l’association de la densité de la population et des infrastructures limitées. Cette note stratégique traite des éléments connus concernant les vulnérabilités et de la manière de soutenir l’action locale. Elle peut être consultée conjointement avec les notes stratégiques élaborées par la Plateforme Science in Humanitarian Action (SSHAP) sur la quarantaine et les réseaux sociaux. 1 Cette note stratégique a été élaborée pour la SSHAP par l’Institute of Development Studies (IDS) avec la collaboration du Global Challenges Research Fund (GCRF), du consortium Accountability for Informal Urban Equity Hub (ARISE), de la Coalition asiatique pour les droits au logement, de l'Institut international pour l'environnement (IIED), de l’University College de Londres (UCL) et de l’UCL/ du Development Planning Unit (DPU), de l’Université de Birmingham, de l’Université de Lincoln, de l’Université de Manchester, de l’Université de Warwick, de WIEGO et de l’Université York (Canada). La note stratégique a été examinée par des collègues d’Anthrologica, de l’IIED, de l’Université de Manchester, de l’UCL/du DPU, de la FICR et du Programme des Nations Unies pour les établissements humains (ONU-Habitat). La responsabilité inhérente à cette note stratégique revient à la SSHAP.<br><br>Este resumo apresenta considerações importantes para a proteção de assentamentos urbanos informais frente a disseminação e prováveis impactos do COVID-19. Há uma preocupação crescente com estes cenários devido à combinação de densidade populacional e infraestrutura limitada. Este resumo discute o que se sabe sobre vulnerabilidades e como apoiar a ação local. Ele pode ser visto em conjunto com os resumos da Science in Humanitarian Action Platform (SSHAP) sobre quarentena e redes sociais.i Este estudo foi elaborado pelo SSHAP pelo Institute of Development Studies (IDS) com contribuições do Global Challenges Research Fund (GCRF), Accountability for Informal Urban Equity Hub (ARISE), a Asian Coalition for Housing Rights, o International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), University College London (UCL) e o UCL/Development Planning Unit (DPU), University of Birmingham, University of Lincoln, University of Manchester, University of Warwick, WIEGO e York University (Canadá). A revisão foi feita por colegas da Anthrologica, IIED, University of Manchester, UCL/DPU, IFRC e UN-Habitat. O resumo é de responsabilidade do SSHAP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.063 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.061 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".