La construction sociale de la migration : Le rôle de l'expérience et des représentations sociales = Social construction of migration: the role of experience and social representations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'article présente les résultats d'une enquête exploratoire effectuée en Moldavie sur les représentations sociales des 18 jeunes, 9 migrants et 9 non-migrants, et leurs expériences sociales qui façonnent leur rapport à l'émigration au Canada. L'analyse des éléments représentationnels, suite à une technique d'évocation ainsi que l'analyse de contenu intégrée des entrevues semi-dirigées ont révélé des configurations représentationnelles et expérientielles qui permettent de relativiser les explications de la migration avancées par les théories économiques et du choix rationnel. Abstract: The article presents the results of an exploratory survey among 18 young Moldavans of which 9 reported having taken the decision to permanently settle in Canada and 9 others who have not taken a decision to emigrate from their country. The analysis of representational elements following a technique of evocation, as well as the content analysis of semi-structured interviews, has revealed distinct social representations and social experiences of these two categories of respondents. These results allow us to relativize the explanations of international migration advanced by economic and rational choice theories.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".