MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7001522742

Land acquisition strategy, 1986-1991

2020· book· en· W7001522742 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueState Library's electronic repository (State Library of Massachusetts) · 2020
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCommonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersParks Canada
KeywordsAgency (philosophy)State (computer science)Natural (archaeology)Principal (computer security)Land useEcosystem management
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Department of Environmental Management is the principal state agency charged with protecting and developing the Commonwealth's natural resources, promoting forestry and providing outdoor recreation for its citizens.Beginning with the creation of Mr. Greylock State Reservation in 1898, the Department has acquired over 250,000 acres of land in pursuit of this mandate.Is the job done?Does the Commonwealth own aII the land necessary to accomplish its conservation, forestry and recreation mission?These are important questions to consider now, as the cost of land continues to escalate and more and more property is developed.In an effort to answer these questions, the Department has returned to its basic mandate (as expressed in the state's Constitution and General Laws) and evaluated the current system of State Forests and Parks against each aspect of this mandate.The Department's current assessment shows that, in general, the goals of promoting forestry and providing many kinds of outdoor recreation can be accomplished within the existing system.New land acquisition is necessary, however, to address several critical deficiencies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.198
Threshold uncertainty score0.394

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueState Library's electronic repository (State Library of Massachusetts)Same topicCommonwealth, Australian Politics and FederalismFrench-language works237,207