MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7001613556

La romanisation des élites gauloises

2024· article· fr· W7001613556 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueGhent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClassical Antiquity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChaiRomanizationQuarter (Canadian coin)Joint (building)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Au IIe siècle après J.-C., la romanisation allait bon train dans nos régions. Les Romains firent de Tongres une grande ville fortifiée, traversée par une voie très fréquentée. Un riche Gaulois, Marcus Probius Burrus, saisit avec enthousiasme les opportunités offertes par les Romains. Propriétaire d’une maison à Tongres, d’une villa campagnarde à Tirlemont, d’importantes propriétés et peut-être d’un commerce florissant, siégeant au conseil de la cité, il avait le vent en poupe. C’est notamment grâce à des élites locales du même calibre que Burrus que les Romains sont parvenus à s’enraciner profondément dans notre région.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Bibliometrics, Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesBibliometrics, Science and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.770
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0190.055
Science and technology studies0.0020.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGhent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University)Same topicClassical Antiquity StudiesFrench-language works237,207