MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7001622821

La poligamia y la pluriparentalidad en los distintos ordenamientos jurídicos: un análisis comparado para incentivar la discusión sobre la familia plural.

2022· article· en· W7001622821 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFamily and Matrimonial Law
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPluralLatin AmericansLegislationSubject (documents)Common law
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although Colombia has made great advances in the protec-tion of rights since the 1991 Constitution, there is one aspect of family law that has been neglected: the plural family. This figure, composed by the spheres of polygamy and pluriparentality, has already seen important advances in other legal systems, such as Brazil, Canada and the United States; countries that, either by means of a law or through a judicial precedent, have managed to present a discussion that, with arguments such as socio-affec-tivity, or the greater interest of the minor, have been resolved in the acceptance of these figures in their systems. It is time that, as these countries did, Colombia begins a reasoned discussion on the subject.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.873
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)Same topicFamily and Matrimonial LawFrench-language works237,207