Les territoires du Québec et la décentralisation gouvernementale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
À travers les diverses stratégies et actions mises en oeuvre pour occuper, aménager, exploiter, gérer et développer leur vaste espace, les autorités de Québec ont quadrillé celui-ci en aires spécifiques sur lesquelles furent disposées des organisations publiques territoriales capable, en principe, de relever des responsabilités collectives. Ces aires découpées correspondent largement aux principales catégories de territoires conceptualisés dans la littérature scientifique, soit la cité, la région, la communauté, la zone spécialisée (district). Ce rapport, par une analyse des quatre principaux territoires reconnus et utilisés par l'État québécois, c'est-à-dire les municipalités, les régions administratives, les territoires MRC et les zones désignées, permet de décrire la construction institutionnelle passée et actuelle de ces aires officielles. L'analyse conduit également à soulever plusieurs points pertinents pour la problématique de la décentralisation gouvernementale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".