La comunicación padres adolescentes en estudiantes de 5to año de secundaria de la Institución Educativa Pública 7228 Peruano Canadiense, en Villa El Salvador
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this research is to determine the level of communication between adolescent parents in 5th grade students of the public educational institution 7228 Peruvian-Canadian, Villa El Salvador. \nThe study corresponds to a descriptive, basic level research with a quantitative approach according to the handling of the data. The research design is non-experimental, cross-sectional, with a quantitative and descriptive approach. \nThe universe of the population is made up of 60 adolescents 5th year of secondary school of the public educational institution 7228 Peruvian-Canadian, Villa El Salvador. The sample is census, that is, the entire population is taken into account. The technique used to collect the information was the survey and the instrument used was the questionnaire. It is established as conclusion that: The communication of adolescent parents in 5th grade students of the public educational institution 7228 Peruvian-Canadian, is of moderate level in 92%. This means that the communication is not very fluid in the family environment, there is no constant communication and that students may be exposed to risky paths because they do not have instructions from their parents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".