Kooperace a konkurence mezi českými křesťansko-demokratickými stranami po roce 1989
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Czech society is described as the least religious society in Europe. Its historic background does not predispose any explicitly Christian political party to gain more than limited electoral success. Nevertheless, the situation arose at the turn of 19th century, and again during the period 1989 to 1996, in which several Christian-democratic parties were competing in the Czech party-political spectrum. This dissertation focuses on the development of, and mutual relationships (cooperation and competition) between, the Czech Christian-democratic parties after the reestablishment of a multi-party political system in Czechoslovakia (or the Czech Republic) in 1989. The author of this dissertation questions if it is possible to consider the simultaneous existence of two Christian-democratic parties in the period 1989-1996 as a genuine manifestation of two representations of the same ideology within one partypolitical system. And if yes, then what were the reasons behind such heterogeneity within this Christian-democratic 'family' and why wasn't this heterogeneity resolved by the integration of these two parties? Apart from the Czechoslovakian People's Party (renamed after 1991 to the Christian and Democratic Union-Czechoslovak People's Party), as the traditional representative of the Czech Christian-democratic...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it