La independència com a procés constituent. Consideracions constitucionals sobre la creació d'un estat català
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aquest treball pretén definir el marc constitucional per a l’eventual materialització\nde la voluntat majoritària del poble de Catalunya de constituir un\nestat propi i independent. L’estudi parteix de la rellevància que té el sistema\nconstitucional de partida, això és, l’espanyol, així com de la impossibilitat\nd’adequar a aquest marc la secessió. Això és així perquè la secessió, en la\nmesura que suposa l’emergència i la plenitud d’un subjecte polític originari\nque l’estructura constitucional existent ignora, es configura com l’exercici\ndel poder constituent, desvinculat, per tant, del poder de reforma de la\nConstitució, que no és d’aplicació a aquest supòsit. Tot i això, es distingeix\nentre la manifestació de la voluntat constituent, que cabria dintre del marc\nconstitucional vigent, i la seva materialització, que en restaria fora. Ara bé, el\nprocés constituent de la comunitat emergent hauria de ser respectuós amb\nla comunitat política preexistent, en un marc supraconstitucional d’entesa\nentre tots dos actors, basat en el respecte al principi democràtic i l’Estat de\ndret en sentit substancial.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".