MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7001660677

Lecture de l’environnement du Service de police de la Ville de Montréal

2014· report· fr· W7001660677 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2014
Typereport
Languagefr
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicExperimental and Theoretical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsService (business)Subject (documents)Context (archaeology)Criticism
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Collectif d'auteurs dirigé par Michelle Côté et Benoît Dupont, et incluant des contributions de : Marie Beaulieu, Isabelle Billette, Rémi Boivin, Me Alain Cardinal, Anne Chamandy, Mathieu Charest, Caroline Cloutier, Gilbert Cordeau, Valérie Courville\nMaurizio D’Elia, Herman Deparice-Okomba, Michèle Desrosiers, Valérie Fichelle, \nAmélie Forget, Julie Lebel, Michaël Meyer, \nJulie-Anne Moreau, Massimiliano Mulone, Marc Parent, Julie Rosa et Samuel Tanner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.890
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MINDSame topicExperimental and Theoretical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207