MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7001679824

La pastorale nordique dans «La Petite Poule d'Eau» et «Alexandre Chenevert» de Gabrielle Roy

2013· other· en· W7001679824 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · 2013
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal and Regulatory Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiminalityContradictionRomanceSpace (punctuation)CompromiseLiteral and figurative language
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis aims to show how the North in Gabrielle Roy's work is a liminal figurative space that, far from freeing individuals from society's constraints, allows them to reconnect with it in a simplified way. It argues that the characters' "northern" experiences and the mode of their actions, in La Petite Poule d'Eau (The Water Hen) and Alexandre Chenevert (The Cashier), are best defined as pastoral, because they result from an unresolved conflict – a contradiction – between their moral ideals and their passions. Torn between living a solitary life and a communal one, Roy's characters are unable to choose and forced to seek a form of compromise between these two desires. Their ontological uncertainty also sheds light on the tension between the idyllic and romance in Roy's novels, a tension that the liminal location of the northern space illustrates and allows to explore. By bringing together two seemingly antagonistic ideas – the North and the pastoral – and by examining how such an interaction unfolds in the writer's first two "northern" novels, this thesis wishes to underline the dual nature of Roy's characters, novels, and North.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.505
Threshold uncertainty score0.983

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.010
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.159
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)Same topicLegal and Regulatory AnalysisFrench-language works237,207