La projecció de la cultura visual en el dibuix infantil. Una anàlisi des de la perspectiva de gènere en Educació Primària
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aquest estudi busca identificar la influència de la cultura visual, i en concret dels estereotips de gènere en l’imaginari infantil. Per això s’analitza qualitativament una mostra de 224 dibuixos realit-zats per 72 participants d’entre 5 i 12 anys en tres centres d’Educació Primària d’Euskadi. Els resultats gràfics mostren uns trets clarament sexistes que no concorden amb el discurs verbal dels seus autors sobre la igualtat entre gèneres. Els estereotips identificats en els dibuixos s’ajusten totalment a les imatges idealitzades dels models d’home i de dona hegemònics en la nostra cultura visual. Per tant, es pot concloure que el dibuix és una eina útil per a detectar els estereotips arrelats en l’imaginari infantil, i que l’escola ha de nodrir l’alumnat de referents visuals que ajudin a ampliar la seva perspectiva respecte models no normatius que afavoreixin la diversitat dins les aules.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".