L'art. 33 della Convenzione di Montreal sul trasporto aereo internazionale tra giurisdizione e competenza: nuove prospettive giurisprudenziali.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Il saggio analizza l'evoluzione registrata nell'interpretazione dell'articolo 28 della Convenzione di Varsavia-l'Aja e dell'articolo 33 della Convenzione di Montreal del 1999, sul trasporto aereo internazionale, dalla seconda metà del secolo scorso ad oggi. Attraverso un esame dettagliato delle decisioni giurisprudenziali e delle riflessioni della dottrina sulla portata dei criteri di connessione fissati da tali norme, lo scritto si sofferma con particolare attenzione sull'ambito di applicazione del criterio del "place of business through which the contract has been made" nel caso di acquisto diretto online del biglietto di viaggio, alla luce dell'ordinanza 2019 n. 18257 delle Sezioni Unite della Corte di Cassazione e della decisione della Corte di giustizia resa nella causa Guaitoli c. easyJet Airline Co.Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.068 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".