MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7001743472

Les schizophrénies, leurs traitements et le conseil à l'officine

2007· other· fr· W7001743472 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · 2007
Typeother
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicSchizophrenia research and treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoison controlIle de franceNova scotia
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les schizophrénies constituent une pathologie psychiatrique complexe, aux multiples visages. Universelles dans l espèce humaine, elles atteignent des adultes jeunes, dont elles perturbent profondément la personnalité et l aptitude à vivre en société. Leur fréquence, relativement importante, leur sévérité et l ampleur des moyens mis en œuvre pour les traiter en font un problème majeur de santé publique. La prise en charge, multidisciplinaire, s envisage à long terme et aborde chaque patient dans son intégralité. Elle est entravée par la difficulté du diagnostic, qui intervient souvent plusieurs années après le début des troubles. Toutefois les progrès thérapeutiques accomplis depuis plus d un demi-siècle ont progressivement amélioré le pronostic et permettent de plus en plus la rémission partielle voire complète de la maladie. Une chimiothérapie de qualité demeure indispensable. L utilisation optimale des neuroleptiques, principaux psychotropes employés, nécessite un suivi rigoureux avec notamment une gestion correcte des effets indésirables. Des mesures psycho-sociales doivent impérativement être associées et éventuellement des séances de sismothérapie. Le pharmacien d officine participe, par ses conseils et sa vigilance, à la prise en charge du patient schizophrène.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique)→Same topicSchizophrenia research and treatment→French-language works237,207→