MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7001759258

The Liberatory Potential of Fashion

2022· article· en· W7001759258 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHannah Arendt's Political Philosophy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOppressionClothingNarrativeMeaning (existential)Power (physics)ConsumerismCapitalismRelation (database)Colonialism
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fashion has the potential to be liberatory and this can be seen in the ways fashion has been targeted by systems of oppression. Fashion is the use of clothes as a vessel to create a greater social meaning. According to Edward Sapir, the meaning of fashion “while it is primarily applied to dress and the exhibition of the human body is not essentially concerned with the fact of dress or ornament, but with its symbolism” (Barnard, 2007, p. 65). Fashion with the symbolism behind it is able to show the sentiments and attitudes of civilization at different points in history and is tied intimately with the ego (Barnard, 2007). It has the ability to represent time periods, self-identity, and cultures through the medium of clothing. The erasure of traditional dress and practices have been purposeful for the control of Indigenous and marginalized groups. It is purposeful that fashion has been bound to its relation with capitalism and consumerism. But the frivolous narrative that fashion has been given can not overshadow the historical significance that fashion has. Fashion has been used by colonial powers as means to oppress, control, and uphold capitalism, but it has also been used to unify groups of people and to provide solidarity among them. Fashion can be used as a tool of oppression and this has been seen through residential schools in Canada and through the use of uniforms by militaries (Ottmann, 2020). The power of fashion is suppressed and minimized so people do not utilize it to their advantage. Though fashion has been used as a tool for oppression, it is crucial to not lose sight of how it can be used to combat it. Fashion and dress are more than just what we see in the media. It is a composition of eras, identities, and cultures. It can be used to liberate on many various scales. Liberation is when people that are physically or internally oppressed, under their own volition, release themselves from the control and domination of an oppressive group to regain physical and interal autonomy over themselves (Ruth, 1988). To overlook fashion is to overlook the significant role it plays within contemporary society as well as historical events. Fashion and cultural dress are important in retaining stories, way of life, and individuality. It liberates people by providing people with the opportunity to express themselves unforgivingly and also through the unification of people. Fashion is more than just trends and high prices. It can be used in many ways, especially in liberation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.073

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.033
Scholarly communication0.0140.007
Open science0.0010.009
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester)Same topicHannah Arendt's Political PhilosophyFrench-language works237,207