Lisières ; suivi de Passages secrets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce mémoire en recherche-création a pour but de penser nos rapports affectifs avec l’environnement, en s’intéressant plus spécifiquement aux pôles de l’enchantement et de la peur. Le volet création, sous la forme d’un roman, montre Montréal envahie par des figures folkloriques qui représentent les facettes de notre crise écologique. Des récits s’établissent autour de ces apparitions, par lesquels la communauté arrive à faire sens de la menace environnementale. Les diverses sections de l’essai explorent, quant à elles, une sélection de médiations littéraires et philosophiques de l’environnement. Ce faisant, elles cherchent à esquisser un imaginaire ontologique qui, d’une part, provoquerait un dialogue entre les formes du vivant, et d’autre part, cultiverait une disposition affective écologique. \n_____________________________________________________________________________ \nMOTS-CLÉS DE L’AUTEUR : crise écologique, imaginaire, enchantement, peur, fiction spéculative, nouveaux matérialismes, folklore, spiritualité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.038 | 0.017 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".