La movilidad de estudiantes de posgrado de Venezuela y México a Canadá: un estudio exploratorio
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this paper is to report an exploratory research whose general objective was to analyze the movement of Venezuelans and Mexicans who have immigrated (temporarily or definitively) to Canada for graduate studies in that country. The economic value of knowledge, the development of information and communication technologies, the expansion of higher education, the new providers of higher education and the strengthening of so-called world-class universities are some of the elements marking the singularity of this epoch and the internationalization process. Five Canadian universities were identified that receive the\ngreatest number of graduate students from Venezuela and Mexico. Documents were collected and analyzed that express Canadian policy with regard to internationalization and foreign student recruitment. Venezuelan and Mexican graduate students and students\nwho have graduated and decided to remain in Canada were interviewed. Information was requested from Venezuelan and Mexican graduates who have returned to their countries. For Mexicans and Venezuelans who graduate their reasons for having chosen Canada for graduate studies are connected to the prestige of the selected university and the existence of some research group in their area of interest, the economic support offered to graduate students at Canadian universities and, in some cases, personal reasons.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it