MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7001792354

Les politiques publiques visant à soutenir la croissance du transport maritime dans le respect des principes du développement durable : leçons de l'expérience canadienne

2024· other· fr· W7001792354 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSémaphore (Université du Québec à Rimouski) · 2024
Typeother
Languagefr
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransport policyContext (archaeology)Qualitative analysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RÉSUMÉ : Cette thèse s'intéresse à l'applicabilité des politiques publiques de développement durable dans le secteur du transport maritime. Produire une telle connaissance s'avère importante tant sur les plans économique, social, environnemental que sur le plan académique. Nous savons aussi que le sujet émerge de l'appréciation d'un problème actuel : l'écho défavorable fait aux politiques publiques de planification et d'encadrement du transport maritime. Le transport maritime, marqué par de profonds bouleversements en raison de l'innovation technologique, de la mondialisation et de la libération graduelle de l'économie dans la presque totalité des pays, est devenu le principal fournisseur de services dans le commerce international (90 % des échanges mondiaux) avec ses multiples externalités négatives. Ainsi, il devient nécessaire pour les autorités publiques et portuaires d'adopter de nouvelles démarches stratégiques portant sur les perspectives du développement durable. Les résultats de l'étude empirique de ces cas qui constituent le corpus du texte permettent d'analyser notre sujet de recherche, à savoir : la Capacité des politiques publiques à soutenir la croissance du transport maritime dans une perspective d'une gestion intégrée de l'environnement maritime : leçons de l'expérience canadienne. Le dispositif méthodologique s'inscrit dans une démarche qualitative de paradigme épistémologique constructiviste pragmatique, basé sur l'étude de cas multiples avec raisonnement déductif pour mettre en lumière et expliquer les préoccupations des différentes parties prenantes dans l'action des politiques publiques du transport maritime. Il s'agit de la gouvernance portuaire à travers le bilan du modèle canadien depuis la réforme de 1998; ensuite des Portes et corridors commerciaux stratégiques; et enfin de la croissance portuaire, du positionnement (ou vision?) différencié des parties prenantes et le développement des infrastructures sur la base des nouveaux terminaux à conteneurs des ports de Montréal et de Québec. -- Mot(s) clé(s) en français : Transport maritime; politiques publiques; externalités négatives; développement durable; autorités publiques et portuaires; parties prenantes. -- ABSTRACT : This thesis focuses on the applicability of public policies for sustainable development in the maritime transport sector. Producing such knowledge is important both economically, socially, environmentally and academically. We also know that the subject emerges from the assessment of a current problem: the unfavorable echo given to public policies for the planning and supervision of maritime transport. Maritime transport, marked by profound upheavals due to technological innovation, globalization and the gradual liberation of the economy in almost all countries, has become the main provider of services in international trade (90% world trade) with its multiple negative externalities. Thus, it becomes necessary for public and port authorities to adopt new strategic approaches relating to the prospects of sustainable development. The results of the empirical study of these cases which constitute the corpus of the text make it possible to analyze our subject of research, namely: the Capacity of public policies to support the growth of maritime transport in a perspective of an integrated management of the Marine Environment: Lessons from the Canadian Experience. The methodological device is part of a qualitative approach of pragmatic constructivist epistemological paradigm, based on the study of multiple cases with deductive reasoning to highlight and explain the concerns of the various stakeholders in the action of public maritime transport policies. These are port governance through the assessment of the Canadian model since the 1998 reform; then Strategic Trade Gateways and Corridors; and finally port growth, the differentiated positioning (or vision?) of stakeholders and the development of infrastructures based on the new container terminals of the ports of Montreal and Quebec. -- Mot(s) clé(s) en anglais : Maritime transport; public policies; negative externalities; sustainable development; public and port authorities; stakeholders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.770
Threshold uncertainty score0.456

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0110.015
Scholarly communication0.0130.007
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSémaphore (Université du Québec à Rimouski)French-language works237,207