L'histoire des francophones de l'Ouest canadien (Cours de sociolinguistique variationniste à travers l'exemple des français de l'Ouest canadien 2/3)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cours disponible en version PC et smartphone\nDans ce second module, nous traiterons de l'histoire des francophones de l'Ouest canadien. Ce module se divise en quatre parties principales.\nTout d'abord, nous aborderons le rôle joué par les premiers explorateurs, les compagnies de traite de fourrures, ainsi que les missionnaires, dans le développement de l'Ouest canadien.\nDans un second temps, nous étudierons les grandes lignes de l'histoire des Métis de l'Ouest canadien.\nDans la troisième partie, nous reviendrons en profondeur sur le rôle des missionnaires dans le développement des communautés francophones des provinces de l'Ouest.\nLa quatrième partie sera consacrée à l'enracinement de ces communautés francophones.\nEnfin, nous terminerons ce module par une conclusion centrée sur la francophonie de l'Ouest, d'un point de vue contemporain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".